White Paper
Best Practices in risk-based internal auditing
Read this article and improve your knowledge about the current best practices in Risk-Based Internal Auditing.
Über den Inhalt
What is the difference between Internal Auditing and Risk-Based Internal Auditing? Sheryl Vacca believes that is not the question to be answered. Effective audit and monitoring activities will assist in the identification of weaknesses in controls, management’s action to correct those weaknesses, and follow-up to ensure that timely mechanisms have been put in place to strengthen controls for mitigating the business risks.
According to Vacca, effectiveness in the development and execution of the risk-based audit and monitoring plan will be determined by the integrity and characteristics of the overall audit and monitoring process.
Read this article and improve your knowledge about the current best practices in Risk-Based Internal Auditing, or simply Internal Auditing.
Über den Autor
Sheryl Vacca
Sheryl Vacca is a health compliance expert and Senior Vice President and Chief Risk Officer at Providence St. Joseph Health, a $24 billion company with 130,000 caregivers in seven states. Her responsibilities include oversight for compliance, audit, risk management and information security. Previously, she served as the system-wide senior vice president for chief compliance and audit officer at the University of California. Vacca has received awards from the Society of Corporate Compliance and Ethics (SCCE) and the Health Care Compliance Association (HCCA).
